Our fight for records from election reviews isn’t just about transparency — it’s also about exposing the blatantly partisan and dangerously anti-democratic motivations behind those sham investigations.

On April 12, American Oversight asked the court to deny Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Vos’ belated motion to keep private more than 20,000 public records that had been released to American Oversight days before.

Last week, the Wisconsin Assembly’s Office of Special Counsel (OSC) released records — including previously unseen contract agreements — related to the ongoing partisan review of the 2020 election.

The records obtained by American Oversight show that Trump allies’ attempts to get the federal government to help them reverse election results went even broader than previously known,” reported Politico.

So long as any purported evidence remains in short supply, so-called “investigations” into election fraud can be sustained on lies and vague assertions.

The first set of previously deleted records released by the Wisconsin Assembly to American Oversight in response to litigation seeking records of the Assembly's inquiry into the 2020 election.

Efforts to avoid accountability have gone hand in hand with today’s threats to democracy.

In a new court filing, Arizona “audit” contractor Cyber Ninjas tried to walk back its previous estimate of the number of records in its possession related to the Arizona Senate’s partisan review of the 2020 election.

When it comes to actions and false claims that weaken democracy and undermine faith in elections, there is no safe middle ground.

The brief, filed Wednesday, supports an earlier motion American Oversight filed asking the court to find Vos and others in contempt for failing to release certain public records related to the Assembly’s election inquiry.