William Barr and Bar Rules: How Trump’s Nominee Could Be Disqualified from Overseeing Mueller Investigation

BY BETH FRANCE
Counsel, American Oversight

Before President Trump tapped William Barr as his nominee for U.S. attorney general, he reportedly considered Barr for a very different post: leading his defense team. While much of the focus has been on whether Barr, under government ethics rules, should recuse himself from the special counsel investigation into Russian election interference, less attention has been paid to whether another set of rules — those of the District of Columbia Bar, modeled on American Bar Association (ABA) standards — could disqualify him from overseeing that investigation.

Barr allegedly spoke to the president and his top advisers at least twice — in 2017 and again in 2018 — as they attempted to recruit him to the president’s personal defense team. In his confirmation hearing on Tuesday, Barr admitted that he had spoken with both Ambassador David Friedman and Trump about the possibility of representing Trump personally, and that he had discussed Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation with the president or White House officials.

The public already had ample cause for concern with the president’s decision to hand control of the Mueller investigation to a vocal supporter of the president’s actions — even those under the shadow of the investigation, such as the firing of FBI Director James Comey. Barr’s unsolicited 19-page memo criticizing the Mueller investigation heightened those concerns. The revelations that Trump attempted to recruit Barr further call into question where Barr’s loyalties as attorney general would lie.

Switching sides in an ongoing criminal proceeding — as Barr would essentially be doing with regard to the Mueller investigation — is ethically fraught. Lawyers cannot simply delete client confidences from their memories when they shift from defense to prosecution, where divulging them could harm their former clients. And even if a lawyer avoids the temptation to misuse that information (consciously or otherwise), the taint of ambiguous or even divided loyalties threatens the integrity of the proceedings.

Rules of professional conduct governing lawyers seek to avoid these hazards, even when a formal attorney-client relationship has not been established. Risks emerge early and can develop as soon as prospective clients begin discussions with potential lawyers. Under the ABA’s Model Rule 1.18, consultations “about the possibility of forming a client-lawyer relationship” initiate a “prospective client relationship,” which triggers ethical obligations for the lawyer. Specifically, the lawyer must maintain the confidentiality of information that a prospective client shares, and the lawyer may be disqualified from representing a different client “with interests materially adverse to those of the prospective client in the same or a substantially related matter.”

In some jurisdictions, the disqualification requirement kicks in when the prospective client shares information that would be “significantly harmful to that person in the matter” at issue, while other jurisdictions, including the District of Columbia, require disqualification if the lawyer has received any “confidence or secret from the prospective client.” Once a conflict arises between a former prospective client and a new client, the lawyer can only continue to represent the new client after obtaining informed consent from both.

Rule 1.18 presents a real problem for Barr’s participation in the Mueller investigation as attorney general. Under the rubric of the rule, Trump (in his personal capacity) could qualify as a “prospective client” and the U.S. government (via the Mueller investigation) could qualify as the “new client.” Depending on the nature of Barr’s exchanges with Trump and members of his team, Barr may be prohibited from switching from Trump’s side to the government’s side without obtaining informed consent from both.

The details of Barr’s flirtation with Trump’s legal team remain sketchy, but the available information provokes a credible concern that under the above framework, he may be ineligible to represent the U.S. government in the Mueller investigation. Confirming Barr as attorney general would hand him responsibility for the very same matter for which the president once sought his aid, and one in which the Justice Department’s and the president’s interests are manifestly “materially adverse.”

Although Barr told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he was reluctant to enter the “meat grinder” of Trump’s defense, he acknowledged that he discussed the possibility of forming a lawyer-client relationship with the president, as well as with other officials, and that those discussions involved talk of Robert Mueller. Barr’s vague claim that they “discussed the Mueller investigation, but not in any particular substance” does not resolve these ethical concerns—especially in light of his admission that he shared his lengthy, substantive memo criticizing the investigation directly with the president’s lawyers. Courts have found that a “prospective client” relationship can arise when parties engage in discussion of legal theories, evaluation of the strength or weakness of various legal positions, exchange of sensitive information about the facts and events underlying the matter, and assessments of defensive tactics available to the prospective client. By his own testimony, Barr spoke with Trump about Mueller’s character and approach. In addition, he conveyed his legal opinions about the merits of the Mueller probe in writing to Trump’s lawyers. And there is nothing in the public record about how Trump, a notoriously loquacious conversationalist, responded. Such discussions could demand disqualification and indicate that Barr’s relationship with his prospective client has distorted his view of the investigation and compromised his loyalty to his new potential clients: the Department of Justice and its Special Counsel’s Office.

If Trump or his associates shared any confidential information with Barr, including information as simple as their views on the strengths and weaknesses of the case, he is presumptively disqualified from representing the government in the Mueller investigation. His ethical obligations would leave only two options: recuse himself or obtain informed consent from the president and the government. Although Trump would eagerly consent to hand control of the investigation to his hand-selected surrogate, it is not clear who could consent in good faith on behalf of the government. One might argue that Trump is both the prospective client (in his personal capacity) and the new client (in his official capacity), but that would be ethically absurd. One might argue that Barr can give consent for the government once he is attorney general, but that, too, would be absurd. Recusal is the clearest and soundest choice.

Until Barr commits to recusal, the Senate must continue to probe the nature of Barr’s previous engagement with the president and his team, and should put the question to him directly: How have you obtained informed consent from the president and the government to switch sides in the Mueller investigation? That question has not yet been addressed. Informed consent requires, at minimum, Barr addressing these professional responsibility rules directly.

Related Blog Posts

April 17, 2019

Why Congress — and the American People — Deserve to See Trump’s Tax Returns

Congress, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, White House
News
March 29, 2019

News Roundup: The Mueller Investigation Is Over, But the Swamp Is Thriving

News
March 27, 2019

Closing the Corruption-Breeding Loopholes the Trump Administration Has Exploited

Congress, Office of Government Ethics
News
March 25, 2019

The Corruption Continues: Mueller Has Finished His Work. American Oversight Has Not.

News
March 22, 2019

News Roundup: Same Old Stories

News
March 13, 2019

Two Years of American Oversight

News
March 8, 2019

News Roundup: Lawsuits Against Departments of Defense, Agriculture, and Health and Human Services

News
March 7, 2019

New Lawsuit Seeks Records of Agribusiness Influence on USDA School Nutrition Standards

Department of Agriculture
Investigation Update
March 4, 2019

FBI Headquarters Investigation: Agencies Refusing to Search for Records of Trump Interference to Protect Hotel

Investigation Update
February 28, 2019

At Least Fourteen Federal Agencies Have Created No Guidance for Spending Taxpayer Money at Trump Properties

Investigation Update
February 28, 2019

The Complicated World of Wilbur Ross’ Finances

Department of Commerce
News
February 27, 2019

Lying to Congress Rarely Results in Charges — Until Now. Here’s How Others in Trump’s Circle Could Be in Trouble

News
February 22, 2019

News Roundup: Wilbur Ross’ Uncertified Financial Disclosures

News
February 8, 2019

News Roundup: The First Real Confrontation Between the Trump Administration and Congressional Oversight

News
January 9, 2019

Investigating the Acting Defense Secretary’s Ties to Boeing

Department of Defense
News
December 27, 2018

Countdown to Oversight in 2019

News
December 21, 2018

News Round-up: Ghosts of Special Counsel Investigations Past and Present

Department of Justice
Investigation Update
News
December 20, 2018

Betsy DeVos’ Delayed Financial Disclosures Heighten Accountability Concerns

Department of Education
News
December 15, 2018

Statement on Ryan Zinke’s Departure from Interior Department

Department of the Interior
Investigation Update
December 10, 2018

Wait, There’s More: News of Another Administration Official Using Personal Email

Environmental Protection Agency
News
November 21, 2018

OSC Opens Whitaker Case File in Response to American Oversight Request

Department of Justice, Office of Government Ethics, Office of Special Counsel
Investigation Update
November 19, 2018

Ivanka Trump Email Investigation Sparked by American Oversight FOIAs

Department of Commerce, Department of Education, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury, Small Business Administration
Investigation Update
October 23, 2018

New Lawsuit Seeks Details of White House, Trump Organization Involvement in FBI Headquarters Decision

Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, General Services Administration, Office of Management and Budget
Investigation Update
May 3, 2018

Court Rules in Favor of American Oversight in Trump Hotel Lawsuit

General Services Administration
Investigation Update
April 17, 2018

Lawsuit Seeks Scott Pruitt and Nino Perrotta Travel and Security Spending Records

Environmental Protection Agency
Investigation Update
April 6, 2018

New: EPA Documents Show Details of Pruitt Office Renovations

Environmental Protection Agency
Investigation Update
March 16, 2018

Video: Four Strategies for Holding Trump Accountable

News
March 13, 2018

One Year of American Oversight

News
March 9, 2018

New FOIAs: Gun Control, Industry Influences, and Sanctuary Cities

News
March 9, 2018

American Oversight Sues HHS and CMS for Verma Ethics Records

Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services
News
March 6, 2018

Ethics Watchdog Sues HUD for Emails from Carson Family, Lynne Patton, Trump Organization

Department of Housing and Urban Development
Investigation Update
March 2, 2018

Investigation Update: Defund Trump

Investigation Update
February 27, 2018

American Oversight Sues HUD for Carson Office Renovation Records

Department of Housing and Urban Development
Investigation Update
February 21, 2018

American Oversight Calls for a HUD IG Investigation into Carson’s Leadership

Department of Housing and Urban Development
Investigation Update
February 16, 2018

Inside the Documents: Ben Carson Jr’s HUD Emails

Department of Housing and Urban Development
Investigation Update
February 5, 2018

Sessions, Comey, and Clinton: New FOIAs and Lawsuits Seek Answers

News
February 1, 2018

New HUD Emails Show Secretary Ben Carson’s Son Taking Role at Agency

Department of Housing and Urban Development
Investigation Update
January 25, 2018

American Oversight Sues GSA Over Changes to MyPillow Contract

General Services Administration
News
January 19, 2018

Inside the Documents: Ivanka’s Emails, Affirmative Action, and HUD Decisions

News
December 7, 2017

FBI Records Call Into Question Sessions’ Claims About Security Clearance Instructions

Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Investigation Update
November 22, 2017

More Evidence Flynn Concealed Payments

Department of Defense
Investigation Update
November 16, 2017

American Oversight Statement Regarding DOI Report on Zinke Travel

Department of the Interior
Investigation Update
November 8, 2017

American Oversight Statement on Carl Icahn Investigation

Environmental Protection Agency
Investigation Update
November 8, 2017

Statement on Interference in AT&T-Time Warner Merger

Department of Justice
News
November 6, 2017

Over 50 New FOIA Requests Filed Last Week

News
November 2, 2017

Ivanka Trump Continued Using Personal Account in White House

Department of the Treasury
Investigation Update
November 2, 2017

FOIA In Action: Helping Journalists Expose Questionable Behavior By Trump’s Appointees

Department of Education, Department of Labor, Small Business Administration
News
October 27, 2017

American Oversight Calls for Investigation of Payments Made to Trump Organization

Investigation Update
October 24, 2017

Texts Show SBA Staff Tried to “Crop the Opulence” from Trump Hotel Event

Small Business Administration
Investigation Update
October 20, 2017

Congressional Russia Investigations Must be Transparent and Credible

News
October 17, 2017

5 Questions for Attorney General Sessions

Department of Justice
October 10, 2017

New Lawsuit Seeks Answers about Ben Carson’s Management of HUD

Department of Housing and Urban Development
Investigation Update
October 6, 2017

American Oversight Calls for Investigation of Manhattan DA Vance’s Failure to Investigate Fraud at Trump SoHo Development

News
October 5, 2017

Call for Ethics Investigation of Rep. Luke Messer

Office of Congressional Ethics
News
October 5, 2017

Lawsuit Seeks Records of Lolita Zinke’s Travel, Role at Department of the Interior

Department of the Interior
Investigation Update
October 3, 2017

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt’s Calendars Show Deep Industry Connections

Environmental Protection Agency
Investigation Update
September 18, 2017

Austin Evers Discusses Trump Inaugural Funds on MSNBC

News
September 12, 2017

New Lawsuit: Did the FBI Really Advise Sessions to Omit Russian Contacts?

Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Investigation Update
August 28, 2017

Statement on EPA IG Investigation of Pruitt Travel

Environmental Protection Agency
Investigation Update
July 27, 2017

Call for OSC Investigation of Pruitt Travel to Oklahoma

Environmental Protection Agency
Investigation Update
July 6, 2017

American Oversight Statement on Resignation of OGE Director Shaub

Office of Government Ethics
News
June 28, 2017

Ethics Watchdog Sues GSA for Trump International Hotel Lease Records

General Services Administration
Investigation Update
June 23, 2017

Francisco & the Travel Ban: What We Learned from the DOJ Documents

Department of Justice
Investigation Update
June 7, 2017

Statement on the Release of Lobbyist Ethics Waivers

Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of the Interior, Department of the Treasury, Department of Veterans Affairs, Environmental Protection Agency
Investigation Update
May 31, 2017

Investigation of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s Apparent Presence at ExxonMobil Deal Signing

Department of State
Investigation Update
May 17, 2017

Watchdog Sues to Force Release of Ethics Waivers from Eight Trump Administration Agencies

Department of Agriculture, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of the Interior, Department of the Treasury, Department of Veterans Affairs, Environmental Protection Agency
Investigation Update
May 9, 2017

Watchdog Sues to Release Ethics Records of Solicitor General Nominee

Department of Justice
Investigation Update
May 5, 2017

Letter to Senator Grassley: Renew Leadership on Ethics and Transparency

Office of Government Ethics
Investigation Update
April 4, 2017

10 Questions about the Border Wall that Deserve Big, Beautiful Answers

Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, Department of the Interior
Investigation Update
March 30, 2017

Analysis: Anti-Lobbying Act & Dan Scavino

White House
News
March 24, 2017

American Oversight Calls for Investigation of Mnuchin for “Batman” Promotion

Department of the Treasury, Office of Government Ethics
News